Wednesday, April 29, 2015

World Educational Leadership Summit #2: Finnish Lessons

Dear all,

Over the break I will post a couple of Food for Thoughts related to the INTASE World Educational Leadership Summit that I attend. I am going to start with the ideas of Professor Pasi Sahlberg and the story of Finland’s Educational changes. Prof. Sahlberg is Professor of Practice Harvard Graduate School of Education



International benchmarking has become a common tool for policy learning and school improvement. Finland has been the best performing education system outside of East Asia as measured by OECD’s PISA survey. Professor Sahlberg used a decade-long research project on Finnish education to explain how the essential of Finnish society, politics and culture, had led to the model of Finnish educational change

The realization that Finland was doing something different emerged from the first round of PISA data in 2000. From this data the OECD identified what they believed makes education perform well?
-          Collaboration
-          Creativity
-          Trust bond
-          Teacher and leader PD
-          Personalization

From these results a new movement of educational leaders and academic started to emerge from around the world. This movement known as Global Educational Reform Movement of GERM identified some key factors that are restricting the ability of general education to get better. These are standardization, test based accountability, fast track teacher preparation and competition between private and public education.

Professor Sahlberg talked about the importance of the balance between use of technology in schools and traditional tools and practices. He illustrated his point with the following video.



He explained why he thought that Finland has such a good educational system and put it down to smart policies at the government level. He explained that there are no independent schools in Finland so everyone is served by the same system. That for the past 10 years there hasn’t been any standardized testing in schools and the only test students take is at the end of high school to determine their university courses. His final point related to equity in society. Finland 40 years ago deliberately developed a strong equity policy for its society to maximize the potential of a small population. He showed data that there is overwhelming evidence that illustrates that socio-economic background strongly links to their likelihood of success in school. 

Prof Sahlberg then showed how the system in Finland supported schools. The govt is only responsible for policy and budget. Schools create and write their own curriculums. Each school is managed by its own board made up of its own community members and reports to local and regional govt. The district and regions decide how the schools adopt national policies but they insist that teachers and students are involved in planning and assessment.

The idea behind the recent changes in the curriculum that is being encouraged by the Finnish govt., the ones that I shared with you in a recent post appear to be aimed at making learning more engaging, interesting and relevant to the real world. The idea is not to dispense with all subjects but rather to have at least one period that is integrated and developed by teachers and students. The implementation of this will vary by districts and schools and Prof Sahlberg said that some schools make completely revolutionize their curriculum if they feel ready for such a change. He believed that the greater involvement and engagement of students will lead to increased learning and will raise learning objective across Finland.

Professor Sahlberg’s conclusions that were relevant for us at ISHCMC were very interesting. He stressed that:
·         We should celebrate failure regularly in our school year and ensure that failure and success aren’t seen as opposites. “Fail early-fail well”
·         Sitting is the new smoking, and that students sat listening in a class to their teacher does the equivalent damage to their health as smoking cigarettes. “Teach less-learn more”
·         All students should learn foreign languages
·         Differentiation is very important for helping the more able students in school
·         If it sounds crazy it’s probably a good idea in the end so give it a go.


If you are interested here is a link to a recent article that further analyses the Finnish education system .http://fillingmymap.com/2015/04/15/11-ways-finlands-education-system-shows-us-that-less-is-more/

No comments:

Post a Comment